Google Maps vs. Bing Maps: A Showdown of Satellite Images - spencernoblat1959
Microsoft has hardening its sights on Google Maps, adding to a higher degree 165 terabytes of new artificial satellite imagery to Bing Maps. This is the biggest ever information departure for Bing Maps, which had 129TB of data at its disposal.
Of flow from, Google ISN't standing pat; the company has added detailed 3D landmarks to its military service.
Let's fill a head-to-head look at Google Maps and Bing Maps to see which service provides a better look at of various locations round the world.
Hagia Sophia — Stamboul, Turkey
Looking at the Hagia Spohia museum in Istanbul, Google Maps' satellite view has more vivid colours, only Bing Maps has the whip hand when information technology comes to obtrusive details, peculiarly sounding at the intricacies of the roof.
Winner: Bing Maps
Schloss Moritzburg — Germany
The Moritzburg castle in Germany shines on Bing Maps, while Google Maps has washed tabu colors and lacks detail.
Winner: Bing Maps
Durrat Alabama Bahrain — Kingdom of Bahrain
The impressive valet de chambre-made islands in Bahrain look good in some Bing and Google Maps, with a lot of available detail, though with a noticeable color replication difference.
Winner: Tie
William Claude Dukenfield near San Agustin — Andalusia, Spain
The W. C. Fields near the Andalusian townspeople of San Agustin are rich with sharp details on Google Maps, but on Bing Maps the colours really pop music out and pay information technology a more realistic feel.
Winner: Tie
Mendenhall Glacier — Juneau, AK
The details, shadows and colors in Bing's imaging of the Mendenhall Glacier in Alaska are topping Google Maps, which has imagery on a less sunny day information technology seems.
Winner: Bing Maps
Moroccan Mountains — Assa, Morocco
Google and Bing birth great imagery of the Moroccan mountains, featuring the homophonic level of inside information, only with noticeable color differences.
Winner: Attach
Burj Khalifa — Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Strangely enough, Google Maps does not have identical good satellite imagery of the tallest building in the world. Connected Bing though, colors are lifelike, details are sharp and the buildings do not look slanted.
Winner: Bing Maps
Taipei 101 — Taiwan
Looking at other tall edifice, the Taipei 101, Google Maps has punter colors and more inside information, as Bing's imagery looks like it caught whatsoever daze on the lens.
Winner: Google Maps
Sarychevo Peak Vent — Sarychevo, Russia
Google Maps had a really unfavorable day when snapping the Sarychevo Peak Volcano in Russia. For some reason, the entire island is in a park hue, while Bing showcases detailed color-accurate images of the volcano.
Victor: Bing Maps
Oropeza — Chuquisaca, Bolivia
The Oropeza Mountains in Bolivia calculate stunning in sharp imagery on some Google Maps and Bing Maps. Information technology looks like the images were taken at unusual times of the class, yet both are very elaborated.
Winner: Tie
Bing Maps emerges on top, taking five out of 10, with Google Maps getting one win to drop dead with four ties.
Note: When you buy something after clicking golf links in our articles, we May pull in a small commission. Read our associate link insurance for Thomas More details.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/465599/google_maps_vs_bing_maps_a_showdown_of_satellite_images.html
Posted by: spencernoblat1959.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Google Maps vs. Bing Maps: A Showdown of Satellite Images - spencernoblat1959"
Post a Comment